The Milky Way News

Earth's Cosmic Newspaper

DOCUMENT

The Alien Autopsy Film

The 1995 footage of a "Roswell alien" on the table fooled the world for a decade before its makers admitted building the body from sheep parts and jam. Sort of.

Also known as Santilli footage · alien autopsy 1995Updated September 1, 2026

Reference note. This guide explains the basics of well-known UFO and UAP cases, people, and claims: what happened, who was involved, and what supporters and skeptics say. Milky Way News takes no position. Further investigation, skepticism, or belief is up to you.

01What It Is

The alien autopsy film is 17 minutes of grainy black-and-white footage, presented in 1995 by London video entrepreneur Ray Santilli as 1947 military film of a Roswell-recovered being under dissection. Broadcast worldwide (Fox's "Alien Autopsy: Fact or Fiction?" drew enormous ratings), it became perhaps the most viewed piece of alleged UFO evidence in history.

02Provenance and Chain of Custody

Santilli said he bought the reels from an elderly American military cameraman. No cameraman was ever produced for verification, and film stock samples provided for dating never included verifiable autopsy frames. In 2006, promoting a British comedy about the affair, Santilli and partner Gary Shoefield admitted the footage was a "restoration": they claimed genuine film they had once seen had degraded, so they rebuilt it, staging the autopsy in a London flat with sculptor John Humphreys, who confirmed making the bodies (filled with sheep organs and other materials) and playing a surgeon. The "few surviving original frames" they still asserted have never been substantiated.

03What It Says (Shows)

A small, pot-bellied, six-fingered humanoid dissected by gowned figures, with period-dressed staging and deliberately poor camerawork.

04Authentication Status

A confessed fabrication in all its viewable content. Special-effects professionals had identified the staging within months in 1995; pathologists had catalogued anatomical absurdities; Kodak was never permitted proper stock verification. The 2006 confession closed the question, with the "restoration of a real original" caveat treated by researchers as face-saving.

05Why It Matters

The film shaped 1990s UFO culture and injured serious Roswell research by association, a damage ufologists themselves documented. It remains the reference case for provenance discipline: an artifact with no checkable chain of custody, however compelling, is theater. The Nazca mummies coverage regularly cites it as precedent.

06Skepticism

None required beyond the record above; residual believers in a "real original film" hold a claim with zero evidence, kept alive by the confessors' own marketing instincts.

Related dossiers
Sources
  1. The 1995 broadcasts and contemporary effects-community analyses
  2. Santilli and Shoefield's 2006 admissions (Eamonn Investigates: Alien Autopsy, Sky)
  3. John Humphreys' statements on building the bodies
  4. Philip Mantle, Alien Autopsy Inquest (2007), the fullest investigation

Milky Way News Editorial · Reference entry · Last updated September 1, 2026