The Milky Way News

Earth's Cosmic Newspaper

ORG / PROGRAM

The NASA UAP Independent Study Team

Sixteen scientists spent a year on NASA's behalf asking how to study UAP properly. Their 2023 answer: better data, open science, and no evidence of anything extraterrestrial so far.

Also known as NASA UAP panel · NASA independent studyUpdated September 1, 2026

Reference note. This guide explains the basics of well-known UFO and UAP cases, people, and claims: what happened, who was involved, and what supporters and skeptics say. Milky Way News takes no position. Further investigation, skepticism, or belief is up to you.

01What It Is

The NASA Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study Team was a 16-member panel of scientists and experts commissioned by NASA in June 2022 to examine how the agency could contribute to understanding UAP using open scientific data and methods. It was NASA's first formal engagement with the subject since the 1960s.

02Origins

NASA's science leadership, under associate administrator Thomas Zurbuchen, framed the study as destigmatization: UAP deserved the same rigorous curiosity as any anomaly. Astrophysicist David Spergel, president of the Simons Foundation, chaired; members included former astronaut Scott Kelly and leading data scientists.

03What It Did

The team held a public meeting in May 2023 (during which members reported harassment for participating, itself a finding about stigma) and published its final report on September 14, 2023. Conclusions: existing data are of poor quality for anomaly resolution (uncalibrated, incidental, fragmented); NASA should apply its Earth-observing assets, crowdsourcing, and AI/ML pipelines to collect purpose-built data; commercial-aviation reporting should be systematized; and the team found no evidence that UAP have an extraterrestrial origin, while noting the unknowns are real. NASA simultaneously announced a director of UAP research, initially unnamed for harassment concerns, then identified as Mark McInerney.

04Key People

Spergel; NASA officials Zurbuchen, Nicola Fox, and Dan Evans; the 16 panelists.

05Current Status

The panel completed its mandate; its recommendations feed NASA's ongoing, modest UAP research function and its data-sharing relationship with AARO, which continues through the PURSUE era.

06Controversy

Advocates called the effort underpowered (a year, no classified access, small budget) and its no-evidence line premature by its own data-poverty finding. Skeptics mostly praised it as the correct scientific posture. The harassment of panelists drew condemnation across camps and became a standing citation on stigma's persistence.

Related dossiers
Sources
  1. The final report, NASA, September 14, 2023: nasa.gov
  2. The May 31, 2023 public meeting record
  3. NASA's announcement of the UAP research director

Milky Way News Editorial · Reference entry · Last updated September 1, 2026