SCU (Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies)
The volunteer scientists and engineers who write 100-page technical reports on cases like Aguadilla and the Nimitz encounter, and host the field's most data-driven conference.
Reference note. This guide explains the basics of well-known UFO and UAP cases, people, and claims: what happened, who was involved, and what supporters and skeptics say. Milky Way News takes no position. Further investigation, skepticism, or belief is up to you.
01What It Is
The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU) is a nonprofit research organization of scientists, engineers, and former military and law enforcement professionals who produce technical case analyses of UAP incidents. Founded in 2017 (emerging from the group that analyzed the Aguadilla video), it occupies the field's quantitative-methods niche.
02Origins
The Aguadilla working group's 2015 report demonstrated an appetite for long-form instrumented analysis; its authors formalized as SCU with an explicitly agnostic charter: study anomalies, publish methods, claim nothing beyond the data.
03What It Does
SCU publishes peer-reviewed-style papers through its own review process: the Aguadilla report, a widely cited 270-page study of the 2004 Nimitz encounters estimating accelerations from witness and sensor data, analyses of the 1950s film cases, UAP patterns near nuclear facilities, and statistical work on official report datasets. It runs the annual AAPC (Anomalous Aerospace Phenomena Conference), files FOIA requests, and has briefed congressional staff and cooperated with academic authors on journal publications, including papers in Progress in Aerospace Sciences-adjacent venues.
04Key People
Founders and board members including Rich Hoffman, Robert Powell (of the Stephenville radar study), and Larry Cates; a few hundred member-researchers.
05Current Status
Active through the PURSUE era, with its case library among the first stops for journalists seeking technical treatments.
06Controversy
Skeptics credit SCU's transparency while disputing key analyses: the Aguadilla parallax debate and criticisms that the Nimitz acceleration estimates stack witness assumptions into extraordinary numbers. SCU engages critics in writing, which both sides note is rarer than it should be. Within the field, its refusal to conclude frustrates advocates, which SCU treats as evidence of calibration.
- SCU's papers and conference archive: explorescu.org↗
- The Nimitz technical study (2019)
- The Aguadilla report (2015) and the Metabunk exchanges
Milky Way News Editorial · Reference entry · Last updated September 1, 2026
